racism revisited!
Issues of race still fascinate me. This post comes in the wake of a previous post (two faced BB, see below) and the replies it elicited. Of course, there are the other issues around my life and in the larger society as well. The other day Sean (once again i refer to him. This is primarily because he feeds my curiosity on these matters) and discussed the issues of identity and difference within the ethnic UK population (whatever that is)! He had been accused of being racist as he commented on the Scottish and his incredulity was at the concept of being racist even within one's race. My school of thought is where does one begin and end in the quest of determining race? Surely, if race was based on difference, and difference informed identity; then the Scottish can by all means assume their own identity...and subsequently race. Is it easy enough to describe racial difference solely on genetics? As we take into consideration peculiarities like the Jews and the Sikhs, the matter becomes even more complicated. I remember recently reading half of a yellow sun by Orange prize winner Chimamanda Adichie, and the subtle references to the Igbo people as a racial identity cannot be ignored. How far are we willing to go in determining identity and difference?
British Comedian Bernard Manning died recently to much debate. In my opinion, an entirely inconsequential event. However, it does re-awaken the earlier question on my blog. Which is better, subtle/hidden racism or blatant racism? Manning was racist/homophobic/sexist without apologies. That was his reality and i assume the vast majority of the straight white males of this society, regardless of age. The fact that a group of people alive today laughed at his jokes informs this. Gavin Esler's pussyfooting interview with one of Manning's on newsnight was also suspect, so why pretend?
A friend of mine (a brash Nigerian girl, know to voice opinions rather loudly) was told me that the fault of society was the incorrect assumption that racism was/is a one way street. The white man being racist to everyone else. Does this not put unfair power in his hands? Is this not misleading to other ethnicity's who share the same animosity? Other ethnicity's who are therefore perceived powerless under their assumed roles as the conquered? Your thoughts please!
4 Comments:
The issue of racism can never be over emphasized. It keeps on rearing its ugly head and spreading it's tentacles to ever nook and cranny of the world.
You might wanna read my lates blog post to know exactly what i'm talking about.
Byt, nice analysis here. First tym on yur blog though, so i want a welcome anthem..kapish...lol!
Having left London to live in South Africa I was amazed at the blatant racism I experienced. Whites were totally upfront with their racism. At times it could even be dangerous, as they were not use to being answered back in the same way I was not use to saying ‘Yes Bwana!’ and keeping my eyes lowered every time I spoke to them.
The experience(s) put into perspective the kind of things my parents went through when they emigrated to Britain in the 50s – and I’m ashamed to say I used to think they were exaggerating! But to answer your question, yes it is better to 'see' it than for people to pretend and hide it - I think! When it's upfront, then at least you know where the person is coming from - no pretence. But when it's hidden, it's an ongoing guessing game. But to be fair to the Anglo-Saxon, he keeps his racism under wraps, he will be 'polite' and he will even move out of London not to have any confrontation, and to be with his own. As they say in Nigeria - they have tried!
thanks for stopping by UD...
nick: bwana ke? what nonesense?
Talking about racism, you'll never stop, where do you start and where do you stop? But to your friend I'll say it's about power and who has it. Being positive and forward thinking is good but the reality is the reality and that's why definitions are in reference to the person/people who have the power
Post a Comment
<< Home